Michal Niemkiewicz, 

Barrister and Solicitor

Michal Niemkiewicz, 

Barrister and Solicitor

Michal Niemkiewicz

Barrister and Solicitor

Hello.

My name is Michal Niemkiewicz

I'm a Canadian intellectual property lawyer

Welcome to my site

Services.

Litigation

Advice

Transactions

  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Industrial Designs
  • Plant Breeders' Rights
  • Trade Secrets
  • Licensing
  • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals
  • Administrative Law

My work.

Keycafe v. KeyNest
patent infringement action relating to key tracking and exchange technology
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on three Measurement While Drilling patents
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on four Measurement While Drilling technology patents
Zimmerman v. Duroair
action relating to sale of business involving clean room technology patents
Muse Gallery v. Muse Art Annex
passing off action relating to a business name
The D Drops Company v. Nutralab
patent and trademark infringement action relating to a vitamin product

Hello.

My name is Michal Niemkiewicz

I'm a Canadian intellectual property lawyer

Welcome to my site

Hello.

My name is Michal
Niemkiewicz

I'm a Canadian
intellectual property
lawyer

Welcome to
my site

Hello.

My name is Michal Niemkiewicz

I'm a Canadian
intellectual property
lawyer

Welcome to
my site

Services.

Litigation

Advice

Transactions

  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Industrial Designs
  • Plant Breeders' Rights
  • Trade Secrets
  • Licensing
  • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals
  • Administrative Law

My work.

Keycafe v. KeyNest
patent infringement action relating to key tracking and exchange technology
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on three Measurement While Drilling patents
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on four Measurement While Drilling technology patents
Zimmerman v. Duroair
action relating to sale of business involving clean room technology patents
Muse Gallery v. Muse Art Annex
passing off action relating to a business name
The D Drops Company v. Nutralab
patent and trademark infringement action relating to a vitamin product

Services.

    Litigation

    Advice

    Transactions

  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Industrial Designs
  • Plant Breeders' Rights
  • Trade Secrets
  • Licensing
  • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals
  • Administrative Law

My work.

Keycafe v. KeyNest
patent infringement action relating to key tracking and exchange technology
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on three Measurement While Drilling patents
Mostar v. Drill-Tek
infringement action on four Measurement While Drilling technology patents
Zimmerman v. Duroair
action relating to sale of business involving clean room technology patents
Muse Gallery v. Muse Art Annex
passing off action relating to a business name
The D Drops Company v. Nutralab
patent and trademark infringement action relating to a vitamin product

Latest updates.

In a patent case, the Federal Court of Appeal affirms a summary judgment of non-infringement, discusses s. 53.1 file wrapper estoppel for the first time and cautiously leaves possibilities open

This January Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal in Canmar Foods Ltd. v. TA Foods Ltd., 2021 FCA 7 affirmed a decision dismissing a patent infringement action for a lack of infringement on a motion by the defendant for summary judgment (see here for the decision on the motion). While recent

read more

Ontario’s Divisional Court enforces “no-challenge” clause, issues preliminary injunction preventing Canadian defendant in US infringement action from challenging patent

Here is something that does not come up often in the case law: earlier this fall in Loops L.L.C. v. Maxill Inc., 2020 ONSC 5438, Ontario’s Divisional Court issued an interlocutory injunction against a defendant in a US patent litigation to enforce a “no-challenge” clause contained in a settlement of

read more

Get in touch.

Michal Niemkiewicz
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto, ON
M5X 1C7

416.854.9429

Latest updates.

In a patent case, the Federal Court of Appeal affirms a summary judgment of non-infringement, discusses s. 53.1 file wrapper estoppel for the first time and cautiously leaves possibilities open

This January Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal in Canmar Foods Ltd. v. TA Foods Ltd., 2021 FCA 7 affirmed a decision dismissing a patent infringement action for a lack of infringement on a motion by the defendant for summary judgment (see here for the decision on the motion). While recent

read more

Ontario’s Divisional Court enforces “no-challenge” clause, issues preliminary injunction preventing Canadian defendant in US infringement action from challenging patent

Here is something that does not come up often in the case law: earlier this fall in Loops L.L.C. v. Maxill Inc., 2020 ONSC 5438, Ontario’s Divisional Court issued an interlocutory injunction against a defendant in a US patent litigation to enforce a “no-challenge” clause contained in a settlement of

read more

Get in touch.

Michal Niemkiewicz
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto, ON
M5X 1C7

416.854.9429

Latest updates.

In a patent case, the Federal Court of Appeal affirms a summary judgment of non-infringement, discusses s. 53.1 file wrapper estoppel for the first time and cautiously leaves possibilities open

This January Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal in Canmar Foods Ltd. v. TA Foods Ltd., 2021 FCA 7 affirmed a decision dismissing a patent infringement action for a lack of infringement on a motion by the defendant for summary judgment (see here for the decision on the motion). While recent

read more

Ontario’s Divisional Court enforces “no-challenge” clause, issues preliminary injunction preventing Canadian defendant in US infringement action from challenging patent

Here is something that does not come up often in the case law: earlier this fall in Loops L.L.C. v. Maxill Inc., 2020 ONSC 5438, Ontario’s Divisional Court issued an interlocutory injunction against a defendant in a US patent litigation to enforce a “no-challenge” clause contained in a settlement of

read more

Get in touch.

Michal Niemkiewicz
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto, ON
M5X 1C7

416.854.9429

Latest updates

In a patent case, the Federal Court of Appeal affirms a summary judgment of non-infringement, discusses s. 53.1 file wrapper estoppel for the first time and cautiously leaves possibilities open

This January Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal in Canmar Foods Ltd. v. TA Foods Ltd., 2021 FCA 7 affirmed a decision dismissing a patent infringement action for a lack of infringement on a motion by the defendant for summary judgment (see here for the decision on the motion). While recent

read more

Ontario’s Divisional Court enforces “no-challenge” clause, issues preliminary injunction preventing Canadian defendant in US infringement action from challenging patent

Here is something that does not come up often in the case law: earlier this fall in Loops L.L.C. v. Maxill Inc., 2020 ONSC 5438, Ontario’s Divisional Court issued an interlocutory injunction against a defendant in a US patent litigation to enforce a “no-challenge” clause contained in a settlement of

read more

Get in touch.

Michal Niemkiewicz
100 King Street West
Suite 5700
Toronto, ON
M5X 1C7

416.854.9429